Using Participant Questionnaires to Assess Mediator Performance
Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law
Robert W. Rack
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Dispute Resolution Magazine, Vol. 11, p. 33, 2004
This article summarizes the findings of an empirical study that examined the usefulness of attorneys’ assessments of mediator skillfulness as a method for monitoring mediator performance. Attorneys who had participated in federal appellate civil mediation rated the mediator's skillfulness on seven dimensions as part of a larger questionnaire about their mediation experience. Attorneys gave some of the mediators higher skillfulness ratings than other mediators, and rated individual mediators as more skillful on some dimensions than on other dimensions. These findings indicate that the attorneys' assessments were sufficiently discriminating and nuanced to reveal differences among the different mediators and among the different skills each mediator possessed. Importantly, the ratings did not simply mirror whether settlement or other favorable outcomes were achieved in mediation. Taken together, these findings suggest that participant assessments could provide an effective means for monitoring mediator performance.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 1
Keywords: mediator, mediation, empirical research
Date posted: December 17, 2010
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 1.750 seconds