Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1726482
 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



The Sitting Ducks of Securities Class Action Litigation: Bio-Pharmas and the Need for Improved Evaluation of Scientific Data


Stuart R. Cohn


University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law

Erin M. Swick


White & Case LLP

November 1, 2010

Delaware Journal of Corporate Law (DJCL), Vol. 35, No. 3, 2010
University of Florida Levin College of Law Research Paper No. 2010-25

Abstract:     
Rule 10b-5, a powerful weapon against any publicly-listed company whose share price drops on adverse news, is particularly skewed against pharmaceutical and other bio-technology companies (bio-pharmas). It is not a coincidence that there is a disproportionate number of class actions filed against bio-pharmas. The volume and complexity of data underlying most bio-pharma cases create enormous outcome uncertainties, settlement pressures, and potentially huge contingent liabilities over substantial periods of time. The vulnerability and risks that bio-pharmas face in Rule 10b-5 class actions are unique among all publicly-traded industries, yet many cases proceed along traditional grounds without courts employing either their statutory or inherent powers to obtain objective expert assessment of the data underlying plaintiffs' claims. Most judges have neither the training nor the capacity to differentiate between the positions of opposing experts or to reach their own independent assessment of the research data.

The unstated premise of the Supreme Court's Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals opinion is that courts have an obligation to fully understand the evidence prior to any decision-making, and that the use of court-appointed experts will allow judges to decide motions to dismiss with greater confidence and accuracy. The early appointment of such experts may also have the salutary effect of causing plaintiffs to pause and consider whether the claims are sufficient to warrant the up-front imposition of court-appointed expert costs. If courts begin to recognize in greater numbers the importance of obtaining objective expert testimony, we believe that a more level playing field will evolve to reduce the disproportionate vulnerability of bio-pharmas to securities law class actions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 48

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: December 17, 2010  

Suggested Citation

Cohn, Stuart R. and Swick, Erin M., The Sitting Ducks of Securities Class Action Litigation: Bio-Pharmas and the Need for Improved Evaluation of Scientific Data (November 1, 2010). Delaware Journal of Corporate Law (DJCL), Vol. 35, No. 3, 2010; University of Florida Levin College of Law Research Paper No. 2010-25. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1726482

Contact Information

Stuart R. Cohn (Contact Author)
University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 117625
Gainesville, FL 32611-7625
United States
Erin M. Swick
White & Case LLP ( email )
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 503
Downloads: 58
Download Rank: 165,812
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.281 seconds