Smith and Women's Equality
Leslie C. Griffin
University of Nevada, Las Vegas, William S. Boyd School of Law
December 16, 2010
Cardozo Law Review, Vol. 32, No. 5, 2011
U of Houston Law Center No. 2010-A-45
This essay was part of a Cardozo symposium celebrating the twentieth anniversary of the landmark free exercise case, Employment Division v. Smith. I argue that full enforcement of Smith is essential to women’s equality. I explain that male-dominated religious communities have repeatedly opposed women’s rights by seeking not only to exempt themselves from the law of women’s equality but also to change the content of that law to undermine women’s rights. Although Smith has given women’s groups some victories over this anti-egalitarian trend, resistance to Smith and refusal to apply its holding have harmed women’s rights.
In Part I, I explain why Smith is necessary to support women’s equality in the family and reproductive rights. In Part II I argue that if Smith were taken seriously, the courts would not continue to dismiss sex discrimination lawsuits under the invented ministerial exemption and church autonomy theories of the First Amendment, and the legislatures would not persistently seek to undo Smith’s regime by exempting religious groups from the law.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 26
Keywords: First Amendment, free exercise, women’s equalityAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 18, 2010 ; Last revised: May 9, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.282 seconds