|
||||
|
||||
Reply: Clawback to the FutureMiriam A. CherrySaint Louis University - School of Law Jarrod WongUniversity of the Pacific - McGeorge School of Law December 17, 2010 Minnesota Law Review Headnotes, Vol. 95, p. 19, 2010 Abstract: In an earlier article also available on SSRN, Clawbacks: Prospective Contract Measures in an Era of Excessive Executive Compensation and Ponzi Schemes, Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 94, p. 368, 2009, Professors Miriam Cherry and Jarrod Wong set out an initial description and analysis of contractual clawback provisions. In this Reply, Profs. Cherry and Wong address three aspects of Michael Macchiarola's Response: its application of the clawback doctrine to the recoupment of executive compensation; the criticism that the clawbacks doctrine introduces latent subjectivity into contractual analysis; and the apparent operational difficulties in implementing clawbacks.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 10 Keywords: Clawbacks, Ponzi Schemes, Executive Compensation, Executive Bonuses Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: December 18, 2010Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.406 seconds