Footnotes (46)



Debunking the Socratic Method?: Not So Fast, My Friend!

Daniel J. Dye

Phoenix School of Law

August 18, 2010

Phoenix Law Review, Vol. 3, p. 351, 2010

This is a response to Professor Scott Taylor's assertion that the problem method should replace the Socratic case-method in legal education. I argue that Professor Taylor's call to abandon the Socratic method, while understandable, goes too far. I believe (and argue) that delivering useful legal education via the Socratic method is not only possible, but can be done well. The Socratic method is simply a tool whose results depend on its proper application.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 14

Keywords: Socratic Method, Problem Method, Legal Education

JEL Classification: I21

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 18, 2010 ; Last revised: December 16, 2012

Suggested Citation

Dye, Daniel J., Debunking the Socratic Method?: Not So Fast, My Friend! (August 18, 2010). Phoenix Law Review, Vol. 3, p. 351, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1727949

Contact Information

Daniel J. Dye (Contact Author)
Phoenix School of Law ( email )
One North Central Ave.
14th Floor
Phoenix, AZ 85004-4414
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 527
Downloads: 72
Download Rank: 246,382
Footnotes:  46
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.187 seconds