Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1728902
 
 

Footnotes (53)



 


 



Clarifying the Doctrine of Inequitable Conduct


Elizabeth I. Winston


Catholic University of America (CUA) - Columbus School of Law

December 20, 2010

John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 10, 2011
CUA Columbus School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-17

Abstract:     
Addressing squarely the issue of the multiple standards of materiality in inequitable conduct litigation, Therasense v. Becton Dickinson raises many difficult issues that could be clarified through the lens of the analogous concept of fraud on the Trademark Office. The standards for finding fraud on the Trademark Office lack the ambiguity found in the doctrine of inequitable conduct, despite the parallel penalties of unenforceability and requirements of proof of materiality and intent. Informed by the many decisions of Judge Michel, this essay concludes that the standards for finding fraud before the Trademark Office, as set forth in In re Bose, lights the path the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit should follow in Therasense, setting workable standards for finding inequitable conduct before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 13

Keywords: inequitable conduct, therasense, bose, fraud, patent, trademark, intellectual property

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 21, 2010 ; Last revised: September 22, 2011

Suggested Citation

Winston, Elizabeth I., Clarifying the Doctrine of Inequitable Conduct (December 20, 2010). John Marshall Review of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 10, 2011; CUA Columbus School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-17. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1728902

Contact Information

Elizabeth I. Winston (Contact Author)
Catholic University of America (CUA) - Columbus School of Law ( email )
3600 John McCormack Rd., NE
Washington, DC 20064
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 594
Downloads: 55
Download Rank: 228,440
Footnotes:  53
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.265 seconds