Footnotes (20)



Constitutional Dialogue and Judicial Supremacy

Miguel Schor

Drake University Law School

December 23, 2010

Suffolk University Law School Research Paper 10-66
Drake University Law School Research Paper No. 12-02

This paper analyzes constitutional dialogue by comparing a constitutional system that (almost) entrenches judicial supremacy - the United States - with a constitutional system that seeks to reconcile a judicial and legislative role in constitutional interpretation - Canada. The argument has three parts. The second part critically examines the scholarship on constitutional dialogue in Canada and the United States. Dialogue theory in the United States focuses on how societal actors respond to judicial decisions whereas Canadian dialogue theorists emphasize legislative sequels to judicial review. The question is why did dialogue take a different path in Canada than in the United States. The third part analyzes this question. The American Supreme Court enjoys a greater degree of autonomy in interpreting the constitution than does the Canadian Supreme Court. Constitutional politics, not constitutional text, however, decisively shaped the tools available to political actors to respond to judicial decisions both in Canada and in the United States. The fourth part argues that weakening judicial supremacy, as has occurred in Canada, has a democratic pay-off. Constitutional systems that empower legislatures to share in the task of judicial review are more likely to engender trust between competing political factions; judicial supremacy, on the other hand, is more likely to facilitate political polarization.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: Constitutional Dialogue, Judicial Supremacy, Judicial Review, Supreme Court, Comparative Constitutionalism

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: December 23, 2010 ; Last revised: January 25, 2012

Suggested Citation

Schor, Miguel, Constitutional Dialogue and Judicial Supremacy (December 23, 2010). Suffolk University Law School Research Paper 10-66; Drake University Law School Research Paper No. 12-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1730202 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1730202

Contact Information

Miguel Schor (Contact Author)
Drake University Law School ( email )
2621 Carpenter Ave.
Des Moines, IA 50311
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,943
Downloads: 337
Download Rank: 63,184
Footnotes:  20

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.375 seconds