The Ethics of Reasoning from Conjecture
University of Virginia School of Law
December 10, 2010
Journal of Moral Philosophy, Forthcoming
Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2011-02
An important objection to political liberalism is that it provides no means by which to decide conflicts between public and non-public reasons. This article develops John Rawls’s idea of "reasoning from conjecture" as one way to argue for a commitment to public reason. Reasoning from conjecture is a form of nonpublic justification that allows political liberals to reason from within the comprehensive views of at least some unreasonable citizens. After laying out the basic features of this form of nonpublic justification, this article responds to three objections based on concerns about insincerity, cultural imperialism, and the epistemic authority of those who reason from conjecture.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 20
Keywords: political liberalism, public reason, nonpublic reason, justification, Rawlsworking papers series
Date posted: December 24, 2010 ; Last revised: February 7, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.343 seconds