Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1730340
 
 

Citations (1)



 
 

Footnotes (53)



 


 



The Ethics of Reasoning from Conjecture


Micah Schwartzman


University of Virginia School of Law

December 10, 2010

Journal of Moral Philosophy, Forthcoming
Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2011-02

Abstract:     
An important objection to political liberalism is that it provides no means by which to decide conflicts between public and non-public reasons. This article develops John Rawls’s idea of "reasoning from conjecture" as one way to argue for a commitment to public reason. Reasoning from conjecture is a form of nonpublic justification that allows political liberals to reason from within the comprehensive views of at least some unreasonable citizens. After laying out the basic features of this form of nonpublic justification, this article responds to three objections based on concerns about insincerity, cultural imperialism, and the epistemic authority of those who reason from conjecture.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 20

Keywords: political liberalism, public reason, nonpublic reason, justification, Rawls

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: December 24, 2010 ; Last revised: February 7, 2011

Suggested Citation

Schwartzman, Micah, The Ethics of Reasoning from Conjecture (December 10, 2010). Journal of Moral Philosophy, Forthcoming; Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2011-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1730340 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1730340

Contact Information

Micah Schwartzman (Contact Author)
University of Virginia School of Law ( email )
580 Massie Road
Charlottesville, VA 22903
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 822
Downloads: 210
Download Rank: 84,931
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  53

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.641 seconds