Historic Perspectives on Law & Science
University of California Hastings College of the Law
May 1, 2008
Stanford Technology Law Review, p. 1, 2009
Law has had a long and troubled relationship with science. The misuse of science within the legal realm, as well as our failed attempts to make law more scientific, are well documented. The cause of these problems, however, is less clear. With this in mind, I would like to suggest that the unsatisfying relationship of law and science can be attributed, at least in part, to law’s inadequate understanding of what constitutes science and law’s inflated view of the potential benefits of science for law.
The article begins by describing law’s vision of science. It then traces the history of Western philosophical thought on what constitutes science in an effort to demonstrate for a legal audience how modern philosophical views of science contrast sharply with perspectives in law. Finally, the article explores the nature of law and describes distortions in our image of what science can do for law. In particular, while most people would argue that the changing nature of science creates problems for law, this article suggests that it is the constantly evolving nature of law that makes science such a bad fit for the development of legal doctrines.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18
Keywords: law and society, Law & Society, history, law and science, law & Science, intellectual property, patent, copyright, trademarkAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: December 28, 2010
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.406 seconds