|
||||
|
||||
Making Talk Cheap (and Problems Easy): How Legal and Political Institutions Can Facilitate ConsensusCheryl BoudreauUniversity of California, Davis Mathew D. McCubbinsUniversity of Southern California - Marshall School of Business, Gould School of Law and the Department of Political Science Daniel B. RodriguezNorthwestern University - School of Law Nicholas WellerUniversity of Southern California - Department of Political Science; University of Southern California - School of International Relations November 18, 2010 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, Vol. 7, Issue 4, pp. 868-885, 2010 Abstract: In many legal, political, and social settings, people must reach a consensus before particular outcomes can be achieved and failing to reach a consensus may be costly. In this article, we present a theory and conduct experiments that take into account the costs associated with communicating, as well as the difficulty of the decisions that groups make. We find that when there is even a small cost (relative to the potential benefit) associated with sending information to others and/or listening, groups are much less likely to reach a consensus, primarily because they are less willing to communicate with one another. We also find that difficult problems significantly reduce group members willingness to communicate with one another and, therefore, hinder their ability to reach a consensus.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 18 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 3, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.985 seconds