Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1734379
 


 



Prolegomenon on the Status of the Hopey, Changey Thing in American Criminal Justice


Frank O. Bowman III


University of Missouri School of Law

November 16, 2010

Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2010
University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-03

Abstract:     
This is an introductory essay to Volume 23, Number 2, of the FEDERAL SENTENCING REPORTER, which considers the state of American criminal justice policy in 2010, two years after the "Change" election of 2008.

Part I of the essay paints a statistical picture of trends in federal criminal practice and sentencing over the last half-decade or so, with particular emphasis on sentence severity and the degree of regional and inter-judge sentencing disparity. The statistics suggest that the expectation that the 2005 Booker decision would produce a substantial increase in the exercise of judicial sentencing discretion and a progressive abandonment of the strictures of the Guidelines has begun to prove correct. However, the statistics also reveal that Booker has almost certainly increased geographical disparity in federal sentencing, and the available evidence suggests that inter-judge disparity has increased as well.

Part II of the essay analyzes the responses of the major federal institutional actors – particularly the judiciary, the Department of Justice, the defense bar, the U.S. Sentencing Commission, and Congress – to the post-Booker advisory guideline system and considers the prospects for federal sentencing reform generally. It suggests that the mixed results of the Booker advisory guidelines experiment may contribute to its somewhat surprising longevity. The essay also takes a somewhat pessimistic view of the post-election prospects for useful federal sentencing reform.

Parts III and IV of the essay introduce a series of terrific articles in this issue of FSR on state criminal justice developments, as well as an article reflecting on the addition of Justice Sotomayor, a former trial judge, to the Supreme Court.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 21

Keywords: Booker, Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Kimbrough, Gall, federal judges, sentencing, sentencing disparity, disparity, sentence severity, Sentencing Commission, Department of Justice, judiciary, Sixth Amendment, regional disparity, inter-judge disparity

JEL Classification: K14, K41, K42

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 4, 2011 ; Last revised: March 4, 2011

Suggested Citation

Bowman III, Frank O., Prolegomenon on the Status of the Hopey, Changey Thing in American Criminal Justice (November 16, 2010). Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2010; University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-03. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1734379

Contact Information

Frank O. Bowman III (Contact Author)
University of Missouri School of Law ( email )
Missouri Avenue & Conley Avenue
Columbia, MO 65211
United States
573-882-2749 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 562
Downloads: 60
Download Rank: 220,734

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.297 seconds