|
||||
|
||||
Responding to Political Corruption: Some Institutional ConsiderationsJonathan L. EntinCase Western Reserve University - School of Law January 1, 2011 Loyola University Chicago Law Journal, Vol. 42, 2011 Case Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-1 Abstract: This article, written for a conference on "The Scandal of Political Corruption and the Law’s Response," examines some institutional mechanisms (such as open-meetings laws and term limits) that are intended to prevent corruption and others (such as independent counsels, special prosecutors, and ethics commissions) that seek to punish corruption after the fact. The article assesses some of the legal and practical constraints of these devices and, relying on the insights of Durkheim and other social scientists, asks whether some minimum level of corruption might serve the function of helping to define and reinforce social norms and values.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23 Keywords: Corruption, Political corruption, Open meeting laws, Constitutional law, First Amendment, Term limits, Prosecution of corrupt officials, Independent Counsel, State ethics commissions, Durkheim JEL Classification: K10, K42 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 5, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds