Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1734419
 
 

Footnotes (749)



 


 



The New Federal Circuit Mandamus


Paul R. Gugliuzza


Boston University School of Law

May 1, 2012

Indiana Law Review, Vol. 45, p. 343, 2012
University of Florida Levin College of Law Research Paper No. 2011-06

Abstract:     
This Article explores an ongoing revolution in the mandamus jurisprudence of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the court of appeals with nearly exclusive jurisdiction over patent cases. Before December 2008, the Federal Circuit had never used the interlocutory writ of mandamus to order a district court to transfer a case to a more convenient forum, denying each one of the twenty-two petitions it had decided on that issue. Since that time, however, the court has overturned eleven different venue decisions on mandamus. Remarkably, ten of those eleven cases have come from the same district court, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. This use of mandamus to repeatedly overturn discretionary, non-appealable rulings of one district court is unprecedented in any federal court of appeals. What makes the Federal Circuit’s cases particularly notable is that the court, not long ago, would grant mandamus only on issues governed by Federal Circuit patent law. Because transfer of venue is a non-patent issue controlled by regional circuit law, the recent cases plainly would not warrant mandamus under the court’s prior, narrower standard. The court’s focus on the Eastern District of Texas is also interesting because of the popular view that the Eastern District is biased in favor of patent holders and denies transfer motions with impunity.

This is the first article to analyze the Federal Circuit’s retreat from its original, restrained view of mandamus. It begins by considering why the Federal Circuit initially believed it could grant mandamus on patent issues only, a question previously ignored by the literature. The Article then explores why, in its recent cases, the court has abandoned the view that Federal Circuit mandamus should be limited to issues of patent law. Surprisingly, the Federal Circuit has never explained its reasoning. The Article fills this analytical void and develops a doctrinal, theoretical, and pragmatic rationale for Federal Circuit mandamus on non-patent issues. The Article also offers possible explanations for the Federal Circuit’s fixation on the Eastern District of Texas and proposes a new analytical framework for Federal Circuit mandamus — a framework that might emerge if the court were to critically examine its mandamus power.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 69

Keywords: Federal Circuit, mandamus, patent

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 4, 2011 ; Last revised: October 19, 2012

Suggested Citation

Gugliuzza, Paul R., The New Federal Circuit Mandamus (May 1, 2012). Indiana Law Review, Vol. 45, p. 343, 2012; University of Florida Levin College of Law Research Paper No. 2011-06. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1734419

Contact Information

Paul R. Gugliuzza (Contact Author)
Boston University School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,359
Downloads: 170
Download Rank: 102,089
Footnotes:  749
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.203 seconds