Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1734529
 
 

Footnotes (125)



 


 



Creditor and Debtor Windfalls from Divorce


James R. Ratner


University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law

October 20, 2011

Estate Planning & Community Property Law Journal, Vol. 3, p. 211, 2011
Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 11-04

Abstract:     
At the end of a marriage, marital debt must be allocated. Under most marital property regimes, a divorce allocation does not preclude a creditor of the marital community from seeking satisfaction from either spouse, community creditors receive a potential windfall when a couple divorces. As a consequence, the divorce enables a community creditor to obtain satisfaction from assets that are separate property assets of a non-debt-incurring spouse, while these assets are unavailable to the creditor during marriage. The current California statutory regime explicitly offers the potential for this windfall whenever the non-debtor spouse is allocated all or a portion of a community debt at divorce, because debts allocated to a spouse at divorce can be satisfied with all of the assets controlled by that spouse, without the need for tracing. At the same time, under the current California statutory regime the creditor can be harmed by the divorce if the non-debtor spouse is not allocated any of a debt at divorce, because none of the assets taken by the non-debtor spouse are available to the creditor, even though the creditor would have had access to them during the marriage. Both currently-existing approaches are undesirable. Windfalls for creditors needlessly impose on non-debtor spouses at divorce, and windfalls for non-debtor spouses create incentives for couples to divorce to minimize the assets available to creditors, place huge pressure on allocation of debt between the spouses at divorce, and lead in the direction of turning every divorce in which there is unpaid community debt into a bankruptcy-style procedure in which the needs of the creditors influence the allocation of debts and assets.

A simple solution will eliminate these windfalls from divorces and avoid the incentives created by such windfalls. A post-marital debt structure that is the mirror image of typical premarital debt structures should either be read into current statutes, or enacted, to remove the windfalls. The result would entitle creditors to only those assets that would have been available had there been no divorce. While this will necessitate tracing each asset that a creditor seeks to obtain from a non-debtor spouse, and may raise some difficult untangling matters, such tracing is a familiar activity, already undertaken in creditor/debtor contexts in community debt/separate debt regimes whenever a creditor seeks contested assets against a married creditor. Requiring such tracing will not be overly cumbersome, and the approach avoids the far more encompassing problem of hurting non-debtor spouses at divorce or involving creditors in every divorce in which there is unpaid marital debt.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 31

Keywords: marital debt, marital property,

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 5, 2011 ; Last revised: October 20, 2011

Suggested Citation

Ratner, James R., Creditor and Debtor Windfalls from Divorce (October 20, 2011). Estate Planning & Community Property Law Journal, Vol. 3, p. 211, 2011 ; Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper No. 11-04. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1734529

Contact Information

James R. Ratner (Contact Author)
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 548
Downloads: 59
Download Rank: 217,819
Footnotes:  125

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.281 seconds