Charities and Lobbying: Institutional Rights in the Wake of Citizens United
Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer
Notre Dame Law School
January 4, 2011
Election Law Journal, Vol. 10, p. 407, 2011
Notre Dame Legal Studies Paper No. 10-39
One of the many aftershocks of the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Citizens United v. FEC is that the decision may raise constitutional questions for the long-standing limits on speech by charities. There has been much scholarly attention both before and after that decision on the limit for election-related speech by charities, but much less attention has been paid to the relating lobbying speech limit. This article seeks to close that gap by exploring that latter limit and its continued viability in the wake of Citizens United. I conclude that while Citizens United by itself does not undermine the limit on lobbying by charities, the decision does reinforce the constitutional requirement that the government allow charities to easily form a non-tax favored alternative for engaging in unlimited lobbying. Some post-Citizens United proposals for regulating speech-related activity may in fact run afoul of this requirement. More importantly, the intersection of Citizens United and this tax-based limit on charity speech may be a catalyst for renewed consideration of whether the unconstitutional conditions doctrine could be successfully refined in the subsidy context through an approach that considers the purpose of the subsidy and how important the speech-related limit is to the accomplishment of that purpose.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 35
Keywords: campaign finance, charity, charitable, Citizens United v. FEC, election law, elections, first amendment, free speech, IRS, lobbying, nonprofit, political, taxation, tax-exempt organizationAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 6, 2011 ; Last revised: April 12, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.312 seconds