Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1737857
 
 

Footnotes (26)



 


 



Foreclosures and the Failure of the American Land Title Recording System


Tanya D. Marsh


Wake Forest Law School

January 10, 2011

Columbia Law Review, Vol. 111, No. 1, 2011

Abstract:     
In this essay, Marsh argues that the current foreclosure crisis should serve as a wake-up call for a long-overdue modernization of the American land title recording system. Lenders invented the Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS) because the land title system, developed in a far different time and place, failed to meet the needs of the modern real estate industry. But a private MERS-like system is not the answer. Instead, Marsh argues that the federal government should implement a solution that replaces both the existing local land title system and MERS.

An ideal system should be organized around some clear principles. It should be transparent. It should be easy to search, through dynamic, robust indexing, and easy to access, preferably through the Internet. Documents in PDF form should be down-loadable. Electronic filing should be facilitated. There should be uniformity and consistency in the rules governing the form and substance of documents eligible for recording. The system should be public. Establishing and protecting a clear registry of property interests is and should continue to be an essential function of government.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: MERS, mortgage, recording

JEL Classification: K11

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 11, 2011 ; Last revised: April 9, 2012

Suggested Citation

Marsh, Tanya D., Foreclosures and the Failure of the American Land Title Recording System (January 10, 2011). Columbia Law Review, Vol. 111, No. 1, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1737857 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1737857

Contact Information

Tanya D. Marsh (Contact Author)
Wake Forest Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 7206
Winston-Salem, NC 27109
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,528
Downloads: 391
Download Rank: 42,347
Footnotes:  26

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.359 seconds