Has the European Commission Become More Severe in Punishing Cartels? Effects of the 2006 Guidelines

26 Pages Posted: 11 Jan 2011 Last revised: 27 Jan 2011

See all articles by John M. Connor

John M. Connor

American Antitrust Institute (AAI); Purdue University

Date Written: December 13, 2010

Abstract

This paper analyzes the first 13 cartel decisions of the European Commission under its 2006 revised fining guidelines. I find that the severity of the cartel fines is more than five times higher than those figured under the previous 1998 Guidelines. For the first time in antitrust history, I believe we are observing fines that regularly disgorge the monopoly profits accumulated by cartelists. Indeed, three firms’ fines ranged as high as 500% to 650% of affected sales – possible (but rare) examples of supra-deterrence.

Nearly all recent cartel decisions reward one or more participant with full or partial leniency, a much higher share than previously. There is no evidence that leniency discounts have led to larger percentage reductions in cartel-wide fines. Moreover, despite more severe fines, the share of defendants requiring reductions under the Commission’s 10% cap or ability-to-pay considerations has not risen.

The frequency and size of recidivism discounts has gone up markedly under the new guidelines. There is ample evidence that the Commission has been inconsistent in applying recidivism penalties in the manner promised it its 2006 Guidelines. In particular, it has been lenient by failing to account for numerous previous violations.

Keywords: antitrust, European Commission, EU, cartel, collusion, price-fixing, optimal deterrence, penalties, leniency, amnesty

JEL Classification: L41, L44, L65, L11, L13, N60, K21, K14

Suggested Citation

Connor, John M. and Connor, John M., Has the European Commission Become More Severe in Punishing Cartels? Effects of the 2006 Guidelines (December 13, 2010). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1737885 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1737885

John M. Connor (Contact Author)

Purdue University ( email )

333 Massachusetts Ave.
UNIT 505
Indianapolis, IN 46204
United States
+1 463-221-1692 (Phone)

American Antitrust Institute (AAI) ( email )

1730 Rhode Island Avenue, NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20036
United States
202-536-3408 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.antitrustinstitute.com

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,102
Abstract Views
6,292
Rank
36,581
PlumX Metrics