|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper, please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id1917453. ; Size: 332K
|
|
Predicting Drift on Politically Insulated Institutions: A Study of Ideological Drift on the United States Supreme Court
Ryan J. Owens University of Wisconsin - Madison - Department of Political Science
Justin Wedeking University of Kentucky - Dept. of Political Science
December 29, 2010
Abstract:
We examine whether policymakers can predict whether nominees to the Supreme Court will drift ideologically. We analyze the pre-nomination speeches, articles, and separate opinions published by every justice who served at least ten years on the Court. Our data show that we can indeed predict whether a nominee will drift ideologically once on the Court.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46
Keywords: Supreme Court nominations, ideological drift
working papers series
Download This Paper
Date posted: January 12, 2011
; Last revised: August 28, 2011
Suggested CitationOwens, Ryan J. and Wedeking, Justin, Predicting Drift on Politically Insulated Institutions: A Study of Ideological Drift on the United States Supreme Court (December 29, 2010). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1738309 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1738309
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1.
Emotion, Neuroscience, and Law: A Comment on Darwin and Greene
By
John Mikhail
2.
Sorting Guilty Minds
By
Francis Shen,
Morris Hoffman, ...
3.
Bits of Bias
By
Jerry Kang
4.
How Judges Judge
By
Corey Yung
5.
Must Virtue Be Particular?
By
Frederick Schauer
6.
Retribution and the Experience of Punishment
By
John Bronsteen,
Christopher Buccafusco, ...
7.
Taking Note of Notes: Student Legal Scholarship in Theory and Practice
By
Andrew Yaphe
8.
The Origins, Nature, and Promise of Empirical Legal Studies and a Response to Concerns
By
Theodore Eisenberg
9.
The Supreme Court 2010 Term - Foreword: Neutral Principles, Motivated Cognition, and Some Problems for Constitutional Law
By
Dan Kahan
|
|
|
|