Restraint and Proliferation in Criminal Law
University of New Brunswick Faculty of Law
January 12, 2011
Review of Constitutional Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2010
This paper considers why the criminal law continues to grow despite broad-based policy consensus on the harms of over-criminalization. I argue that political expediency combines with the Canadian constitutional arrangement under ss. 91 and 92 of the Constitution Act, 1867 to drive the expansion of Canadian criminal law. The federal power to criminalize and the provincial responsibility for enforcement amounts to a constitutionally directed unfunded mandate. In a case study of the Westray Bill, the paper examines the political mechanisms and institutional forces that further the expansion of the criminal law and that result in ineffective, inefficient and ultimately harmful prohibitions. The paper concludes that it is legitimate to invoke the constitutional power of the courts to limit the scope of the criminal law and shows how this can be achieved without abandoning established constitutional and criminal law principles and precedent.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 33
Keywords: Criminal Law Power, Canadian Constitutional Law, Legitimacy of Judicial Review, Corporate CrimeAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 22, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.500 seconds