|
||||
|
||||
Survey Mode Effects on Valuation of Environmental GoodsJason BellDuke University - Fuqua School of Business Joel C. HuberDuke University - Fuqua School of Business W. Kip ViscusiVanderbilt University - Law School; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); Vanderbilt University - Department of Economics; Vanderbilt University - Owen Graduate School of Management; Vanderbilt University - Strategy and Business Economics December 31, 2010 Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 11-04 Abstract: This article evaluates the effect of the choice of survey recruitment mode on the value of water quality in lakes, rivers, and streams. Four different modes are compared: bringing respondents to one central location after phone recruitment, mall intercepts in two states, national phone-mail survey, and an Internet survey with a national, probability-based sample. The modes differ in terms of the representativeness of the samples, non-response rates, sample selection effects, and consistency of responses. The article also shows that the estimated benefit value can differ substantially depending on the survey mode. The national Internet panel has the most desirable properties with respect to achieving the survey dimensions of interest.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 21 Keywords: survey methods, environmental economics, environmental policy, stated preference, benefit-cost analysis, water quality JEL Classification: Q25, C81 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 13, 2011 ; Last revised: November 27, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.453 seconds