Problem-Solving Courts and the Defense Function: The Wisconsin Experience
University of Wisconsin Law School
January 12, 2011
Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 62, No. 5, 2011
Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1149
Problem-solving courts have emerged as one of the fastest growing innovations in the criminal justice system. Their growth has not been without controversy, given their dramatic departure from a traditional adversary model in favor of a collaborative approach in dealing with offenders with serious alcohol, substance abuse, or mental health issues. The most outspoken criticism of this approach has come from the defense bar. This paper suggests much of the criticism is misplaced, and, that if care is exercised in separating the roles that defense counsel play in communities with problem-solving courts the promise of this approach for appropriate offenders can be realized without compromising the core duties that counsel owes his client. The template proposed here for reconciling these conflicting interests is based in large part on the work and experiences of shareholders in Wisconsin problem-solving courts. It is further suggested that the proposed ABA Standards for the Defense Function fail to address most, if not all, of the unique defense function issues presented by the problem-solving court model.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 24
Keywords: defense function, problem-solving courts, drug courts
JEL Classification: K14Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 13, 2011 ; Last revised: February 1, 2011
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.469 seconds