The Low-Volatility Anomaly: Market Evidence on Systematic Risk versus Mispricing
Hong Kong University of Science & Technology (HKUST)
Rodney N Sullivan
AQR Capital Management
Florida Atlantic University - Department of Finance
March 11, 2013
Financial Analysts Journal 72 (1), 36-47, January/February 2016
We explore whether the well publicized anomalous returns associated with low-volatility stocks can be attributed to market mispricing or to compensation for higher systematic risk. Our results, conducted over a 46 year study period (1966-2011), indicate that the high returns related to low-volatility portfolios cannot be viewed as compensation for systematic factor risk. Instead, the excess returns are more likely to be driven by market mispricing connected with volatility as a stock characteristic.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32
Keywords: low-volatility stocks, market, risk, mispricing
Date posted: January 13, 2011 ; Last revised: July 16, 2016
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.547 seconds