Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1739363
 
 

Footnotes (167)



 


 



Bifurcated Review of Interpreter Determinations Under the Court Interpreters Act


David H. Chao


Yale University - Law School

January 12, 2011

Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, Fall-Winter 2010

Abstract:     
Since the passage of the Court Interpreters Act in 1978, defendants have had a statutory right to a language interpreter when the district court determines that the defendant’s language barrier inhibits his comprehension. When defendants have appealed their convictions, claiming that the court erroneously denied them an interpreter, courts of appeals review the lower court determinations for clear error or abuse of discretion. This Article argues that this deferential standard is not proper for reviewing interpreter determinations under the Act, which are mixed questions of law and fact. Instead, appellate courts should review findings of fact for clear error and legal conclusions de novo.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

Keywords: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law and Procedure, Immigration Law, Language Interpreters

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 13, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Chao, David H., Bifurcated Review of Interpreter Determinations Under the Court Interpreters Act (January 12, 2011). Connecticut Public Interest Law Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1, Fall-Winter 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1739363

Contact Information

David H. Chao (Contact Author)
Yale University - Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 353
Downloads: 21
Footnotes:  167

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.281 seconds