|
||||
|
||||
An Integrated Approach to Oversight Assessment for Emerging TechnologiesJennifer KuzmaUniversity of Minnesota, Twin Cities - Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs Jordan ParadiseSeton Hall University - School of Law Gurumurthy Ramachandran, PhDUniversity of Minnesota, Twin Cities Jee-Ae KimUniversity of Minnesota - Twin Cities Adam KokotovichUniversity of Minnesota - Twin Cities Susan M. WolfUniversity of Minnesota Law School 2008 Risk Analysis, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 1197-1219, 2008 Abstract: Analysis of science and technology oversight systems is often conducted from a single disciplinary perspective and by using a limited set of criteria for evaluation. In this article, we develop an approach that blends risk analysis, social science, public administration, legal, public policy, and ethical perspectives to develop a broad set of criteria for assessing oversight systems. Multiple methods, including historical analysis, expert elicitation, and behavioral consensus, were employed to develop multidisciplinary criteria for evaluating oversight of emerging technologies. Sixty-six initial criteria were identified from extensive literature reviews and input from our NSF-funded project Working Group. Criteria were placed in four categories reflecting the development, attributes, evolution, and outcomes of oversight systems. Expert elicitation, consensus methods, and multidisciplinary review of the literature were used to refine a condensed, operative set of criteria. Twenty-eight criteria resulted spanning four categories: seven development criteria, fifteen attribute criteria, five outcome criteria, and one evolution criterion. These criteria illuminate how oversight systems develop, operate, change, and affect society. We term our approach “integrated oversight assessment” and propose its use as a tool for analyzing relationships among features, outcomes, and trade-offs of oversight systems. Comparisons among historical case studies of oversight using a consistent set of criteria should result in defensible and evidence-supported lessons to guide the development of oversight systems for emerging technologies, such as nanotechnology.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 23 Keywords: Nanotechnology, nanobiotechnology, science and technology, emerging technology, oversight, oversight systems, empirical studies, expert elicitation, multi-criteria assessment, risk analysis, science regulation, oversight assessment, new governance, gene therapy, biotechnology, GMOs Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: January 16, 2011 ; Last revised: January 22, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 2.391 seconds