Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1739984
 
 

References (6)



 


 



Conflict Between Doctor and Patient


Susan M. Wolf


University of Minnesota Law School

Winter 1988

Law, Medicine & Health Care, Vol. 16, pp. 197-203, 1988

Abstract:     
Conflict between doctor and patient is inevitable. Their training, perspective, and stake in any clinical decision are markedly different. Yet clinical interaction and the scholarship are rife with efforts to avoid that conflict. Jay Katz has famously explored physician silence as a strategy of avoidance; he argues that the systematic avoidance of conflict is a tradition in medicine, grounded in ancient paternalistic commitments. Yet even the reconceptualized doctor-patient relationship born of modern bioethics sweeps conflict under the rug. Numerous articles on decisions to forgo resuscitation, for instance, speak euphemistically of patient "participation" in the decision, failing to face the fact that the patient’s refusal of life-sustaining treatment controls. In the clinic too, the prevailing notion is that if the clinician is skilled enough, the patient can be managed and conflict prevented.

This article is an attempt to take conflict in the relationship seriously. It is an examination of the persistence of old strategies to avoid conflict, including continued silence, and the emergence of new ones, such as physician claims that they need not discuss with patients treatments the physician deems futile. Physicians also are asserting claims of conscientious refusal, allowing a doctor who disagrees with a patient’s choice to withdraw from the case. The article analyzes these responses to doctor/patient conflict and finds them deeply problematic.

To ignore the inevitability of doctor/patient conflict – to prioritize harmony, "shared decision-making," and "patient participation" – is to revive in new form the old practice of ignoring the differences between the interests and perspectives of doctor and patient. To take those differences seriously, means accepting disagreement and working with it. It means trading the peacefulness of silence for the rough-and-tumble of real conversation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: Doctor-patient relationship, doctor-patient communication, physician, patient, autonomy, paternalism, conflict, conscientious objection, medical futility, bioethics, medical ethics, health law, informed consent, Jay Katz

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 16, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Wolf, Susan M., Conflict Between Doctor and Patient (Winter 1988). Law, Medicine & Health Care, Vol. 16, pp. 197-203, 1988. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1739984

Contact Information

Susan M. Wolf (Contact Author)
University of Minnesota Law School ( email )
229 19th Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55455
United States
612-625-3406 (Phone)
612-624-9143 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.umn.edu/facultyprofiles/wolfs.html
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,691
Downloads: 274
Download Rank: 64,491
References:  6

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.266 seconds