Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1740567
 
 

Footnotes (281)



 


 



After the Spill is Gone: The Gulf of Mexico, Environmental Crime, and the Criminal Law


David M. Uhlmann


University of Michigan Law School

January 16, 2011

Michigan Law Review, Vol. 109, p. 1413, 2011
U of Michigan Public Law Working Paper No. 227

Abstract:     
The Gulf oil spill was the worst environmental disaster in U.S. history, and will be the most significant criminal case ever prosecuted under U.S. environmental laws. The Justice Department is likely to prosecute BP, Transocean, and Halliburton for criminal violations of the Clean Water Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, which will result in the largest fines ever imposed in the United States for any form of corporate crime. The Justice Department also may decide to pursue charges for manslaughter, false statements, and obstruction of justice. The prosecution will shape public perceptions about environmental crime, for reasons that are understandable given the notoriety of the spill and the penalties at stake. In some respects, the Gulf oil spill is similar to other environmental crimes, most notably because it involves large corporations that committed serious violations because they put profits before environmental compliance and worker safety. Yet the spill’s most distinctive qualities make it an anomalous environmental crime: the conduct was not as egregious, the harm was far worse, and the penalties bear no relation to norms for environmental crime.

The Justice Department should bring criminal charges based on the Gulf oil spill, because a criminal prosecution will deter future spills better than civil penalties alone and will express societal condemnation of the negligence that caused the spill in ways that civil enforcement cannot. But criminal prosecution of the Gulf oil spill may raise questions about the role of criminal enforcement under the environmental laws, including whether ordinary negligence should result in criminal liability as well as what the proper normative relationship should be between culpable conduct and environmental harm. Nor can criminal prosecution, without more, prevent future spills; for that to occur, we must demand greater attention to safety and more rigorously enforce our drilling laws.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: Environmental Law, Criminal Law, Corporate Crime, White Collar Crime, Corporate Compliance Programs, Regulation of Offshore Drilling

JEL Classification: K14, K20, K23, K32, K40, K41, K42, L50, L51, L70, L71, Q40, Q48

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 16, 2011 ; Last revised: June 15, 2014

Suggested Citation

Uhlmann, David M., After the Spill is Gone: The Gulf of Mexico, Environmental Crime, and the Criminal Law (January 16, 2011). Michigan Law Review, Vol. 109, p. 1413, 2011; U of Michigan Public Law Working Paper No. 227. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1740567

Contact Information

David M. Uhlmann (Contact Author)
University of Michigan Law School ( email )
625 South State Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1215
United States
(734) 764-7362 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 3,969
Downloads: 831
Download Rank: 14,674
Footnotes:  281

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.219 seconds