Because You're Mine I Walk the Line: The Trials and Tribulations of the Family Visa Program
Evelyn Haydee Cruz
Arizona State University (ASU) - Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law
September 1, 2010
Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2010
The current backlog of over 3.5 million immigration visas places strains on mixed immigration status families and exacerbates the undocumented population problem. Families who choose to wait for a visa to become available before reunifying may strain the family unit. Those who reunify in the United States without first obtaining legal status face deportation and inadmissibility because of their unlawful residence in the United States.
Congress has made some attempts to alleviate these strains. Unfortunately, the broad intent of these statutory changes has run up against narrow administrative interpretation. Nonetheless, in the present political climate, administrative solutions that seek to solve inadequacies in the current system are more politically expedient than installing a completely new family visa program. Therefore, immigration reform efforts must focus on expansive statutory interpretation of these and other existing statutes.
In this essay I outline the social costs of an inadequate family visa program and offer some suggestions for administrative improvements to the program that do not necessitate legislative action. However, the inadequacies of the current family petition system must eventually be addressed through a congressional overhaul of the process. Therefore, I visit the history of narrow administrative interpretation of immigration legislative action to highlight how important agency interpretation is in the drafting of immigration legislation. I conclude the essay by discussing the elements I believe should be included in family visa petition reform.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 27
Keywords: Immigration, Aliens, Administrative Procedures, Statutory Interpretation, Immigration Reform, Visas, Family Petitions, Immigration Law, Citizenship and Immigration ServiceAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 17, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.312 seconds