Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (197)



 


 



The Perils of Empowerment


Jane Aiken


Georgetown University Law Center

Katherine Goldwasser


Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law

January 14, 2011

Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 20, 2010
Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 11-13
Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-01-03

Abstract:     
This Article examines bystander norms of disinterest and blame that inform and undermine strategies for dealing with significant social problems such as domestic violence. Current strategies rely on individual “empowerment” to reduce such violence. These strategies reflect fundamental misconceptions and false assumptions about the nature of domestic violence, about why this sort of violence persists so stubbornly, and, ultimately, about what it takes to change behavior that has long been tolerated, if not actually fostered, as a result of deeply imbedded social and cultural norms. The net effect is that far from empowering abused women, let alone reaching the norms that have made this form of abuse such an intractable problem, the so-called empowerment approach instead perpetuates the traditional view of domestic violence as a private matter, properly the business of no one except the two intimates themselves. Everyone else is a mere bystander. The responsibility for ending domestic violence is squarely placed in the hands of its (supposedly) now-empowered victims: it is up to each individual battered woman to end the violence against her; if she fails she has only herself to blame. Drawing on the literature on norms and the law, we analyze how successful norm-changing strategies in other contexts suggest a different and more effective approach to the problem of domestic violence. The conscious change of tactics in anti-smoking campaigns from a focus on protecting the smoker to a focus on protecting non-smokers has resulted in a surprisingly rapid change in cultural norms about smoking. Lessons drawn from that campaign suggest new strategies for coping with domestic violence. The Article concludes that given the financial and personal negative effects of domestic violence on third parties, norm changing strategies that rely, not on notions of individual empowerment and autonomy, but rather on strategies grounded in the idea that domestic violence is a community problem that affects us all, are far more likely to have an impact on reducing intimate violence. Such norm-changing strategies transform the bystander into an interested party.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: abused women, family violence, victims of family violence

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K14, K32

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: January 14, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Aiken, Jane and Goldwasser, Katherine, The Perils of Empowerment (January 14, 2011). Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy, Vol. 20, 2010; Georgetown Public Law Research Paper No. 11-13; Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-01-03. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1740728

Contact Information

Jane Aiken (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Katherine Goldwasser
Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law ( email )
Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 403
Downloads: 86
Download Rank: 149,552
Footnotes:  197

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.406 seconds