Al Maqaleh v. Gates
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law
January 20, 2011
American Journal of International Law, Vol. 104, No. 4, 2010
UCLA School of Law Research Paper No. 11-03
Does the constitutional right to habeas corpus reach to Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan? In Boumediene v. Bush, the Supreme Court held that noncitizens detained at the American naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba could avail themselves of the constitutional right of habeas corpus. In Al Maqaleh v. Gates the DC Circuit faced the same question with regard to Bagram, and ruled that Bagram, while also an offshore American military base, was not analogous to Guantanamo with regard to habeas rights. This brief essay describes the case and analyzes its significance in light of the larger debates over the conflict in Afghanistan and against al Qaeda.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 13
Keywords: constitutional rights of detained non-citizens, conflict in Afganistan, Bagram Air BaseAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 23, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.766 seconds