An Agenda for the Obama Administration on Gender Equality: Lessons from Abroad
Adrien K. Wing
University of Iowa - College of Law
Samuel P. Nielson
Crowell & Moring, Associate Attorney
Michigan Law Review, Vol. 107, p. 124, 2009
U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-16
This article focuses on one question, how should President Obama and his new administration affect social justice for women? There are four main overlapping possibilities to tackle gender inequality problems. The first method is to ratify the Convention on Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (“CEDAW”). The second approach, which is increasingly used in newly drafted or amended constitutions, embraces specific language regarding gender equality. The third method, followed in some constitutions, national legislation, or party rules, is the use of quotas reserving fixed numbers of seats for women in national or local legislatures. The final approach, followed by countries in the prior categories, is national legislation implementing gender equality in various spheres.
Adrien Wing and Samuel Nielson advocate that the Obama administration should emphasize national legislation, and should review international approaches in the debate. Subsequently, the administration should reinvigorate a discussion over passage of a gender equality amendment. Finally, the Obama administration should invite new discussion over CEDAW ratification.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6
Keywords: Women's Rights, Human Rights, Obama Administration, CEDAW, Gender Equality, Recommendations, Policy objectives, discrimination
JEL Classification: K10, K30, K39Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 25, 2011
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.437 seconds