Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1748222
 
 

Footnotes (316)



 


 



An Equilibrium-Adjustment Theory of the Fourth Amendment


Orin S. Kerr


George Washington University - Law School

October 29, 2011

Harvard Law Review, Vol. 125, Forthcoming
GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 524

Abstract:     
Fourth Amendment law is often considered a theoretical embarrassment. The law consists of dozens of rules for very specific situations that seem to lack a coherent explanation. Constitutional protection varies dramatically based on seemingly arcane distinctions.

This Article introduces a new theory that explains and justifies both the structure and content of Fourth Amendment rules: The theory of equilibrium-adjustment. The theory of equilibrium-adjustment posits that the Supreme Court adjusts the scope of protection in response to new facts in order to restore the status quo level of protection. When changing technology or social practice expands government power, the Supreme Court tightens Fourth Amendment protection; when it threatens government power, the Supreme Court loosens constitutional protection. Existing Fourth Amendment law therefore reflects many decades of equilibrium-adjustment as facts change. This simple argument explains a wide range of puzzling Fourth Amendment doctrines including the automobile exception; rules on using sense-enhancing devices; the decline of the “mere evidence” rule; how the Fourth Amendment applies to the telephone network; undercover investigations; the law of aerial surveillance; rules for subpoenas; and the special Fourth Amendment protection for the home.

The Article then offers a normative defense of equilibrium-adjustment. Equilibrium-adjustment maintains interpretive fidelity while permitting Fourth Amendment law to respond to changing facts. Its wide appeal and focus on deviations from the status quo facilitates coherent decisionmaking amidst empirical uncertainty and yet also gives Fourth Amendment law significant stability. The Article concludes by arguing that judicial delay is an important precondition to successful equilibrium-adjustment.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 68

Keywords: Fourth Amendment, reasonable expectation of privacy, technology

JEL Classification: K1, K14, K42

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: January 26, 2011 ; Last revised: November 17, 2011

Suggested Citation

Kerr, Orin S., An Equilibrium-Adjustment Theory of the Fourth Amendment (October 29, 2011). Harvard Law Review, Vol. 125, Forthcoming; GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 524. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1748222

Contact Information

Orin S. Kerr (Contact Author)
George Washington University - Law School ( email )
2000 H Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20052
United States
202-994-4775 (Phone)
202-994-9817 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.gwu.edu/faculty/profile.asp?ID=3568
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 8,853
Downloads: 1,034
Download Rank: 11,115
Footnotes:  316
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1. The Mosaic Theory of the Fourth Amendment
By Orin Kerr

2. Defending Equilibrium Adjustment
By Orin Kerr

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.375 seconds