Teaching Negotiation Ethics

Art Hinshaw

Arizona State University

January 26, 2011

The teaching of negotiation ethics is not necessarily a happy endeavor. The black letter law of negotiation ethics leaves many instructors feeling unsettled because students find the take home lesson to be that deceit, misdirection, dissembling, and lying are “ethical.” If we simply focus on the black letter law without putting negotiations in a broader context of interpersonal interactions and procedural justice, we set our students up for hard lessons once they are in practice. This article presents several methods of helping professors teach negotiation ethics with greater depth and sensitivity, focusing on approaches that are more likely to resonate with students and instructors – even those instructors who have difficulty understanding what it is about routine bargaining that some find so troubling.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 22

Keywords: ethics, negotiation, alternative dispute resolution, conflict resolution, ADR

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: February 2, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Hinshaw, Art, Teaching Negotiation Ethics (January 26, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1748710 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1748710

Contact Information

Art Hinshaw (Contact Author)
Arizona State University ( email )
Box 877906
Tempe, AZ 85287-7906
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 734
Downloads: 189
Download Rank: 106,147
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.313 seconds