Citations (1)


Footnotes (327)



'Hot News': The Enduring Myth of Property in News

Shyamkrishna Balganesh

University of Pennsylvania Law School

Columbia Law Review, Vol. 111, p. 419, 2011
U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 11-06

The ‘hot news’ doctrine refers to a cause of action for the misappropriation of time-sensitive factual information that state laws today afford purveyors of news against free riding by a direct competitor. Entirely the offshoot of the Supreme Court’s 1918 decision in International News Service v. Associated Press, the doctrine enables an information gatherer to prevent a competitor from free riding on its efforts at collecting and distributing timely information. While the doctrine lay dormant for decades, the last few years have seen a renewed interest in its utility, given the financial difficulties of the newspaper industry. News gatherers of different kinds have begun using the doctrine with increased frequency, in the belief that it creates and protects an ownership interest in news, a right that they might be able to leverage to create a licensing market for the use of news that they collect. This Article argues that this belief misapprehends the basis for the hot news doctrine. As a doctrine that originates in the synthesis of two different areas of the common law, unfair competition and unjust enrichment, hot news is concerned principally with solving a collective action problem in the market for news gathering. Recognizing that news gathering involves enormous expenditures on the part of newspapers, it attempts to preserve the incentives of individual competitors to enter into cooperative newsgathering and sharing arrangements that raise their individual and collective profitability, while simultaneously maintaining the common pool (i.e., public domain) nature of factual news. Thus, it attempts to maintain a competitive equilibrium among news gatherers through a gain-based liability framework and, in the process, emphasizes a very different distributive baseline from that inherent in the idea of property in news. Appreciating this difference and its significance is crucial to the doctrine’s continuing survival and sheds light on its inherent unsuitability as a mechanism by which to "reinvent" or "save" newspaper journalism, as some claim it will.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 80

Keywords: quasi-property, newspaper, hot news, misappropriation, unjust enrichment

JEL Classification: K11

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: January 27, 2011 ; Last revised: April 14, 2011

Suggested Citation

Balganesh, Shyamkrishna, 'Hot News': The Enduring Myth of Property in News. Columbia Law Review, Vol. 111, p. 419, 2011; U of Penn Law School, Public Law Research Paper No. 11-06. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1748789

Contact Information

Shyamkrishna Balganesh (Contact Author)
University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )
3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
215-573-7780 (Phone)
HOME PAGE: http://sbalganesh.law.upenn.edu
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 2,797
Downloads: 327
Download Rank: 62,671
Citations:  1
Footnotes:  327

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.516 seconds