Empirical Evidence on Repeat Restatements
University of Texas at Dallas
Nathan Y. Sharp
Texas A&M University - Department of Accounting
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
May 1, 2013
This study examines the characteristics of repeat restatement firms and the market consequences of repeat restatements. We find that 38 percent of the restating companies in our sample restate at least twice between 2002 and 2008, and 31 percent of repeat restatement firms restate three or more times during the same period. Our tests identify several auditor and restatement characteristics that distinguish single from repeat restatements at the time of the first restatement. Repeat restatements are more likely among clients of non-Big N auditors and those with lower ex ante accounting quality. However, firms that switch auditors between the end of their misstatement period and the restatement announcement are less likely to experience repeat restatements. Although subsequent restatements tend to be less severe than the first in a series of restatements, firms suffer similar declines in stock prices with up to three restatement announcements. We also find that firms often restate the same fiscal periods multiple times, and these “overlapping” restatements are more frequent when managers are distracted by other corporate events. Our findings should be valuable to investors, regulators, and other parties interested in the characteristics of repeat restatement firms. We provide research design recommendations for future researchers analyzing restatement samples.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 50
Keywords: repeat restatements, accounting restatements, financial misreporting, audit quality
JEL Classification: M41, M42, G34working papers series
Date posted: January 27, 2011 ; Last revised: September 2, 2013
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.406 seconds