Antitrust Law and the Promotion of Democracy and Economic Growth
Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods; New York University – School of Law
January 1, 2011
Journal of Competition Law & Economics, Vol. 9, 2013 (Forthcoming)
MPI Collective Goods Preprint No. 2011/3
There is a considerable debate in the legal literature about the purpose of antitrust institutions. Some argue that antitrust law merely serves the purpose of economic growth, while others have a broader perspective on the function of antitrust, maintaining that the prevention of economic concentration is an important means to promote democratization and democratic stability. This contribution seeks to test the empirical assumptions of this normative debate. Using panel data of 154 states from 1960 to 2007, it analyzes whether antitrust law actually has a positive effect on democracy and economic growth. The paper finds that antitrust law has a strongly positive effect on the level of GDP per capita and economic growth. However, there is no significant positive effect on the level of democracy. It is suggested that these results might be due to the current structure of existing antitrust laws, which are designed to promote economic efficiency rather than to prevent economic concentration.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 46
Keywords: antitrust law, economic growth, democracy, panel data, first difference
JEL Classification: K21, L00Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: January 31, 2011 ; Last revised: April 1, 2013
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.344 seconds