Democracy and Transparency
B. Peter Rosendorff
New York University (NYU) - Wilf Family Department of Politics
James R. Hollyer
Department of Political Science, University of Minnesota
James Raymond Vreeland
Georgetown University - Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service (SFS); Georgetown University - Department of Government
January 27, 2011
Are democracies more transparent than other types of political regimes? Many people believe that the presence of elections alone is not sufficient for a country to be considered democratic, and that transparency must be included as part of the definition of political regime. We agree that contestability of elections and transparency of policy-making are analytically distinct concepts. Adopting minimalist approaches to democracy and transparency, we ask a basic question: do electoral politics provide incentives for governments to disseminate data? Or, instead, do electoral politics generate incentives to obfuscate information? We thus investigate theoretically the relationship between regime-type and the willingness of policy-makers to provide credible announcements on policy-relevant variables. And we demonstrate empirically that the availability (or absence) of policy-relevant data is correlated with regime type, even after controlling for level of development, participation in IMF programs, country-specific effects, and the effects of time. Democracies are indeed more transparent.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34working papers series
Date posted: January 29, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.453 seconds