Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1752428
 
 

Footnotes (207)



 


 



Disruption and Impossibility: New Laches and the Unfortunate Resolution of the Iroquois Land Claims in Federal Court


Kathryn Fort


Indigenous Law & Policy Center, Michigan State University College of Law

January 31, 2011

11 Wyoming Law Review 375 , 2011
MSU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-03

Abstract:     
That the law changes over time is no secret. That the law changes based on the parties involved is less obvious, but still no secret. In the case of the Haudenosaunee land claims cases, however, the law shifted dramatically and quickly based entirely on the identity of the parties. In less than five years, the federal appellate courts changed the law so drastically to all but end more than thirty years of modern litigation, reversing years of relative fairness at the district court level. These actions required a fundamental shift in the law of equity: the creation of a new equitable defense for governments against Indian land claims. How the courts accomplished so much in such a short amount of time requires a close reading of the cases and a few logical leaps.

The first part of this article will give a brief history of the New York land claims, focusing on the Oneida Indian Nation and the Cayuga Indian Nation of New York. While the tribes have been fighting the status of this land since the original agreements were signed in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century, this article looks to the modern era of land claims in the federal courts. The second part of this article will review how a decision in the Oneida claims case directly informed City of Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation. The third part will focus on the Cayuga Nation line of cases and how Cayuga Indian Nation of New York v. Pataki changed the fundamental understanding of the equitable defense of laches into a new defense used to defeat tribal land claims. Finally, the fourth part of this article will look closely at the most recent loss, Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida, where the court admits the creation of a new equitable defense. This defense, identified as “new laches” or “Indian law laches” is a defense that can prevent even the bringing of a land claim in the courts. The defense is no longer traditional laches, but rather an equitable defense that follows none of the rules of equity, and exists only in federal Indian law.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Keywords: Federal Indian Law, Laches, Land Claims

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 4, 2011 ; Last revised: March 28, 2013

Suggested Citation

Fort, Kathryn, Disruption and Impossibility: New Laches and the Unfortunate Resolution of the Iroquois Land Claims in Federal Court (January 31, 2011). 11 Wyoming Law Review 375 , 2011; MSU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 09-03. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1752428

Contact Information

Kathryn Fort (Contact Author)
Indigenous Law & Policy Center, Michigan State University College of Law ( email )
318 Law College Building
East Lansing, MI 48824-1300
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,540
Downloads: 205
Download Rank: 87,147
Footnotes:  207

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.453 seconds