Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1753166
 
 

Footnotes (277)



 


 



Getting a Grip on the Corset: Gender, Sexuality and Patent Law


Kara W. Swanson


Northeastern University - School of Law

February 1, 2011

Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, Vol. 23, p. 57, 2011
Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper No. 47-2011

Abstract:     
Over twenty years ago, Susan Brownmiller stressed the need to "get a grip on the corset" when considering femininity. In patent law, the "corset case," Egbert v. Lippmann (1881), is a canonical case explicating the public use doctrine. Using a historical exploration of the Egbert case, this paper seeks to "gets a grip" on the corset as part of the burgeoning project to consider the intersections of gender and intellectual property from a feminist perspective. The corset achieved the pinnacle of its use by American women during the decades between the Civil War and the turn of the twentieth century. It was both the near-constant companion of the vast majority of women in the United States and a technological wonder. Like the more celebrated technologies of the era, such as the telephone, the telegraph, and the light bulb, the corset was the product of many inventors, making and patenting improvements, and fighting about their rights in court. As American women donned their corsets, they were enacting a daily intimate relationship with a heavily patent-protected technology. The corset during these decades was deeply embedded both within the social construction of gender and sexuality, as a marker of femininity and respectability, and within the United States patent system, as a commercial good in which many claimed intellectual property rights. Getting a grip on the corset, then, offers a way to simultaneously consider gender, sexuality, and patent law.

After a consideration of what it means to make a feminist analysis of patent law in Part I, in Part II I detail the history of the corset as an invention, using patent records, published opinions, and archival court records. Part III situates this little-known history against the existing historical understanding of the corset as an aspect of female fashion that reinforced gender roles and policed the boundary between public and private, and also uncovers the role of the corset in the courtroom as a witness to women’s sexual activities. Part IV contains an archivally-based excavation of the much-cited and foundational Supreme Court decision, Egbert v. Lippmann, 104 U.S. 333 (1881), in which a patent to an improvement in corsetry was at stake. In Part V, I use the accumulated understandings of the corset as technology, garment and object of legal scrutiny to get a grip on the corset in patent law, making a feminist analysis of the public use doctrine as defined in Egbert.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 59

Keywords: patent, intellectual property, gender, sexuality, feminism, corset, technology

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 10, 2011 ; Last revised: June 3, 2011

Suggested Citation

Swanson, Kara W., Getting a Grip on the Corset: Gender, Sexuality and Patent Law (February 1, 2011). Yale Journal of Law and Feminism, Vol. 23, p. 57, 2011; Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper No. 47-2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1753166

Contact Information

Kara W. Swanson (Contact Author)
Northeastern University - School of Law ( email )
400 Huntington Ave.
Boston, MA 02115
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,643
Downloads: 199
Download Rank: 91,635
Footnotes:  277

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.531 seconds