|
||||
|
||||
The Views of Family Lawyers on Apprehended Violence Orders after Parental SeparationPatrick ParkinsonUniversity of Sydney - Faculty of Law Judith CashmoreUniversity of Sydney - Faculty of Law Atlanta WebsterUniversity of Sydney - Faculty of Law December 1, 2010 Australian Journal of Family Law, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 313-336, 2010 Sydney Law School Research Paper No. 11/13 Abstract: This article examines the views of 40 family lawyers, 20 men and 20 women, about their experience with apprehended violence orders (AVOs) in New South Wales, Australia. There was widespread agreement that AVOs are sometimes used for tactical purposes in relation to family law issues, with the majority of the lawyers considering this happened with some regularity. Few of these lawyers thought that other family lawyers encouraged tactical AVOs, and none acknowledged doing so themselves. They also reported that typically AVOs are sought without legal advice and assistance. Family lawyers expressed a range of views on the threshold at which it is appropriate to seek an AVO, and the difficulty that might be experienced in persuading a magistrate to grant one, particularly in a defended case. None of the lawyers who responded to the question believed that the family courts gave AVOs much consideration in determining parenting disputes. Courts were more persuaded by the actual evidence about the violence.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 38 Keywords: Family Law, Domestic Violence, Restraining Orders, Legal Profession, Parents, Children JEL Classification: K10, K30 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: February 2, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.391 seconds