Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1753914
 
 

Footnotes (307)



 


 



Extracting Compassion from Confusion: Sentencing Noncitizens After United States v. Booker


Francesca Brody


affiliation not provided to SSRN


Fordham Law Review, Vol. 79, 2011

Abstract:     
A noncitizen facing a federal judge for sentencing confronts a demonstrably different future than an otherwise identical citizen. Deportation, immigration detention, harsher prison conditions, and a longer actual sentence may all await the noncitizen federal inmate. The U.S. Courts of Appeals have disagreed as to whether a sentencing judge can take those consequences into consideration in crafting a sentence under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. This Note argues that the circuit split results from circuit courts’ varying appellate scrutiny of sentencing decisions after United States v. Booker. To resolve the split, this Note encourages the Sentencing Commission to adopt an amendment to the Guidelines, thereby promoting uniformity among sentencing courts. In the alternative, this Note argues that it is proper for sentencing courts to consider alienage under 18 U.S.C. § 3553.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: sentencing, immigration, noncitizen, alien, downward departure

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 3, 2011 ; Last revised: April 21, 2011

Suggested Citation

Brody, Francesca, Extracting Compassion from Confusion: Sentencing Noncitizens After United States v. Booker. Fordham Law Review, Vol. 79, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1753914

Contact Information

Francesca Brody (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 501
Downloads: 63
Download Rank: 207,260
Footnotes:  307

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.266 seconds