IFRS Consequences on Accounting Conservatism Within Europe: The Role of Big 4 Auditors
University of Grenoble Alpes; French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) - Centre de Recherches Appliquées à la Gestion (CERAG)
University of Grenoble; French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) - Centre de Recherches Appliquées à la Gestion (CERAG)
University of Grenoble and CERAG-CNRS
We investigate the effects of IFRS adoption in the EU on accounting conservatism, a feature of earnings quality and contracting efficiency, and the way large audit firms (Big 4) moderate these effects. We use an extensive database of more than 5,000 IFRS adopters from 22 EU countries, observed over 2001-2008. The main findings are that: 1) conditional conservatism, as proxied by the asymmetric timeliness of bad vs. good news, has decreased under IFRS for mandatory adopters; 2) the magnitude of this IFRS effect is positively associated with the distance between IFRS and pre-existing local GAAP; 3) Big 4 auditors are associated with more aggressive earnings under IFRS, with simultaneous increase (decrease) in good (bad) news timeliness; 4) unconditional conservatism is higher under IFRS in the presence of a Big 4 auditor; and 5) mandated IFRS offer a weak contribution to a better comparability of accounting earnings as observed from the timeliness perspective. Taken together, these findings suggest that the EU-wide mandatory IFRS adoption has hampered accounting quality.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 55
Keywords: Mandatory IFRS adoption, Earnings Quality, Conservatism, Big 4 Audits, European Union
JEL Classification: M48, M41, M42
Date posted: February 4, 2011 ; Last revised: September 5, 2011
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.437 seconds