The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?
National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA) - GAEL
Mark A. Cohen
Vanderbilt University - Owen Graduate School of Management; Vanderbilt University - Law School; Resources for the Future
University of Ottawa - Common Law Section
HEC Montreal - Institute of Applied Economics
January 18, 2011
Resources for the Future Discussion Paper No. 11-01
Twenty years ago, Harvard Business School economist and strategy professor Michael Porter stood conventional wisdom about the impact of environmental regulation on business on its head by declaring that well-designed regulation could actually enhance competitiveness. The traditional view of environmental regulation held by virtually all economists until that time was that requiring firms to reduce an externality like pollution necessarily restricted their options and thus by definition reduced their profits. After all, if profitable opportunities existed to reduce pollution, profit-maximizing firms would already be taking advantage of those opportunities. Over the past 20 years, much has been written about what has since become known simply as the Porter Hypothesis (PH). Yet even today, we find conflicting evidence and alternative theories that might explain the PH, and oftentimes a misunderstanding of what the PH does and does not say. This paper provides an overview of the key theoretical and empirical insights into the PH to date, draws policy implications from these insights, and sketches out major research themes going forward.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 31
Keywords: Porter Hypothesis, Environmental Policy, Innovation, Performanceworking papers series
Date posted: February 9, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.343 seconds