Abstract

 
 

References (37)



 
 

Citations (2)



 


 



The Demand for Income Tax Progressivity in the Growth Model


Daniel Carroll


Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland - Research Department

February 4, 2011


Abstract:     
This paper examines the degree of income tax progressivity chosen through a simple majority vote in a model with savings. Households have permanent differences with respect to their labor productivity and their discount factors. The government has limited commitment to future policy, so voting is repeated every period. Because the model features mobility within the wealth distribution, the median voter is determined endogenously. In a numerical experiment, the model is initialized to the 1992 U.S. joint distribution of income and wealth as well as several statistics of the federal income tax distribution. Support for a high degree of progressivity is widespread. In the long run, households that vote for lower progressivity have high labor productivity and/or very high wealth. A movement towards greater progressivity increases aggregate capital and income, but effects only a small decrease in long-run income and wealth inequality.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 57

Keywords: Heterogeneity, progressive taxation, wealth distribution, electoral competition

JEL Classification: E21, E62, H24

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 6, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Carroll, Daniel, The Demand for Income Tax Progressivity in the Growth Model (February 4, 2011). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1755164 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1755164

Contact Information

Daniel Carroll (Contact Author)
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland - Research Department ( email )
East 6th & Superior
Cleveland, OH 44101-1387
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 196
Downloads: 34
References:  37
Citations:  2

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.547 seconds