Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1756858
 
 

Footnotes (352)



 


 



Reinventing the EEOC


Nancy M. Modesitt


University of Baltimore - School of Law

December 1, 2010

Southern Methodist University Law Review, Vol. 63, No. 4, p. 1237, 2010
University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-2

Abstract:     
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has struggled to be a meaningful force in eradicating employment discrimination since its inception. The primary reasons for this are structural in nature. The EEOC was designed to react to discrimination complaints by investigating and conciliating all of the thousands of complaints filed annually. The EEOC has never been able to investigate all these complaints despite using the vast majority of its resources attempting to do so. The devotion of resources to managing and investigating the huge volume of complaints prevents the EEOC from taking more effective steps to eliminate discrimination. This article proposes a reinvention of the EEOC by making significant changes to the EEOC’s organization and responsibilities. I advocate five fundamental changes. First, the EEOC should no longer be required to accept and investigate all complaints of discrimination. Instead, it should only investigate and litigate significant claims of discrimination. Second, the threat of EEOC litigation must be given greater force by allowing the EEOC to collect attorneys’ fees and fines from employers when it prevails in litigation. Third, because its mediation program has been quite effective, the EEOC should partner with the federal courts to provide mediation in employment discrimination cases filed in federal court. Fourth, the EEOC should increase its information-gathering and analysis activities to better understand and combat current trends in employment discrimination. Finally, the EEOC needs to expand its discrimination prevention programs by providing significantly more information and training to employers to assist them in complying with federal laws.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 43

Keywords: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, EEOC, Employment Discrimination, U.S. Government Agencies, Federal Courts, Fines, Attorneys' Fees, Employers, Litigation, Mediation Program, Federal Laws, Agency Responsibilities, Agency Reorganization

JEL Classification: K19, K23, K29, K39, K42, K49, J71, J78, J79

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 9, 2011 ; Last revised: March 15, 2011

Suggested Citation

Modesitt, Nancy M., Reinventing the EEOC (December 1, 2010). Southern Methodist University Law Review, Vol. 63, No. 4, p. 1237, 2010; University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-2. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1756858

Contact Information

Nancy M. Modesitt (Contact Author)
University of Baltimore - School of Law ( email )
1420 N. Charles Street
Baltimore, MD 21218
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 649
Downloads: 72
Download Rank: 200,247
Footnotes:  352

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.328 seconds