Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1757257
 
 

Footnotes (39)



 


 



The Purposes of Punishment Test


Youngjae Lee


Fordham University School of Law

October 7, 2010

Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2010

Abstract:     
Until Graham v. Florida decided that the Eighth Amendment prohibits a sentence of life in prison without parole for a nonhomicide crime committed by a minor, the Supreme Court’s proportionality jurisprudence under the Eighth Amendment proceeded along two tracks – capital and noncapital, with the two tracks applying different tests and leading to different outcomes. Graham’s ruling changed all that. Without much fanfare, the Graham Court, considering a challenge to a prison sentence, announced that “the appropriate analysis” was not the one used in Harmelin v. Michigan and Ewing v. California, which dealt with prison sentences, but the one used in Atkins v. Virginia, Roper v. Simmons, and Kennedy v. Louisiana, all death penalty cases. The “death is different” idea, which was looking more and more like an excuse for the Court’s nonintervention in noncapital cases than a principle to justify aggressive interventions in capital cases, appears to have been finally, and rightly, recognized as little more than a meaningless mantra. The focus of this commentary is on another longstanding aspect of the proportionality jurisprudence that should be dismantled: the myth that the sentencing practices held to be unconstitutional advance none of the legitimate goals of punishment and that such a showing is what it takes for a proportionality challenge to succeed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 4

Keywords: Death Penalty, Proportionality, Eighth Amendment, Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 9, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Lee, Youngjae, The Purposes of Punishment Test (October 7, 2010). Federal Sentencing Reporter, Vol. 23, No. 1, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1757257

Contact Information

Youngjae Lee (Contact Author)
Fordham University School of Law ( email )
140 West 62nd Street
New York, NY 10023
United States
212-636-7662 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 275
Downloads: 57
Download Rank: 210,698
Footnotes:  39

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 1.016 seconds