The Legal Turn in Late Development Theory: The Rule of Law and the World Bank’s Development Model
London School of Economics - Law Department
September 1, 2010
Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 52, No. 1, 2011
Long cherished by liberal political philosophers, today the rule of law is increasingly viewed as a necessary requirement, or even silver bullet, for economic development. The past decade has seen the rise of a veritable industry — multilateral development banks, government development agencies, and nongovernmental aid organizations — committed to promoting the rule of law through legal and judicial reform in developing countries. This Article considers the emergence of a new rule of law orthodoxy within contemporary development theory and, in particular, the World Bank’s development model. It asks how and why the Bank has embraced the rule of law discourse, and offers a brief genealogy of the rule of law within the Bank’s theorizing. It argues that the Bank’s interest in law was primarily a response to the critique and failure of its neoliberal policies and identifies the new discourse’s affinities with the rise of New Institutional Economics and “good governance” in the 1990s. Under the Bank’s view, the law’s value for economic development lies in its ability to provide a stable investment environment and the predictability necessary for markets to operate. The role of law is reduced to the facilitation of utility maximizing exchange and optimal market allocation, a view that informs many of the Bank’s specific law reform projects. More a rhetorical shift than a fundamental break in development theorizing, the Bank’s turn to law actually undergirds many continued neoliberal assumptions and masks a continuation of neoliberalism’s core tenets. The new discourse is attractive precisely because it provides strong ideological support for the neoliberal agenda.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34
Keywords: Law and Development, Legal Reform, World Bank, Rule of Law, Institutions, Property Rights, Contracts, Development, Economics, Globalization, Neoliberalism, Washington Consensus, Governance
JEL Classification: B25, K30, O10Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 13, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.469 seconds