Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1758884
 
 

Footnotes (423)



 


 



Implied Certification Under the False Claims Act


Gregory Klass


Georgetown University Law Center

Michael Holt


Georgetown University Law Center

February 9, 2011

Public Contract Law Journal, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2011
Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper No. 11-03

Abstract:     
The False Claims Act prohibits fraud by government contractors, including a contractor's false certification of compliance with the contract, statutes or regulations. In the early 1990s, some courts began holding that the mere act of requesting payment from the government implicitly represents such compliance, exposing breaching contractors to the FCA’s penalty regime. Circuits are today split on the implied certification doctrine. This Article provides a theory of the FCA in general, and implied certification in particular, that explains the value of extracompensatory remedies in this area of contract law. There good reasons for the implied certification rule. It is an information-forcing majoritarian default. It tracks the special ethical obligations of government contractors. And it addresses agency lassitude in drafting and monitoring. But implied certification also has its costs. Most importantly, it lowers the bar to frivolous qui tam actions and threatens to impose FCA liability for violations better addressed by more discretionary and nuanced regulatory tools. This Article recommends rule for implied certification that both addresses these considerations and rationalizes case outcomes. It also argues that, by paying attention to the FCA when drafting contracts, agencies can approximate first-best results by requiring express certification of compliance with those duties for which FCA liability makes sense, and contracting-out of implied certification for those duties that are better enforced in other ways. In addition to these practical suggestions, the Article draws some general lessons about contractual duties to cooperate, interpretive defaults in contract and tort, and the special ethical obligations of government contractors.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 57

Keywords: contract, fraud, False Claims Act, government contracts, interpretation

JEL Classification: K00, K10, K12

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 10, 2011 ; Last revised: December 17, 2011

Suggested Citation

Klass, Gregory and Holt, Michael, Implied Certification Under the False Claims Act (February 9, 2011). Public Contract Law Journal, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2011; Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper No. 11-03. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1758884

Contact Information

Gregory Klass (Contact Author)
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.georgetown.edu/curriculum/tab_faculty.cfm?Status=Faculty&Detail=2165
Michael Holt
Georgetown University Law Center ( email )
600 New Jersey Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20001
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,176
Downloads: 238
Download Rank: 73,815
Footnotes:  423

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds