Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1759537
 


 



Constitutional Argument as Jeremiad


Timothy P. O'Neill


John Marshall Law School

February 10, 2011

Valparaiso University Law Review, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2010

Abstract:     
The "jeremiad" - a lamentation over how a community has fallen away from its religious values - is a particular form of sermon that can be traced back to preachers in 16th century Europe. The Puritans brought it to America in the 17th century. Intellectual historian Perry Miller has called the jeremiad America's first distinctive literary genre.

Sacvan Bercovitch's book "The American Jeremiad" contends that the jeremiad as a mode of rhetoric has always played an important role in American political discourse. This paper extends that analysis to the jeremiad's role in American constitutional argument. Examining recent work by Jack Balkin and Jedediah Purdy through the lens of the jeremiad helps bring into focus some key concepts in the area of constitutional interpretation.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: Jeremiad, Bercovitch, Purdy, Balkin, Perry Miller, Herman Melville, constitutional interpretation

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: February 12, 2011  

Suggested Citation

O'Neill, Timothy P., Constitutional Argument as Jeremiad (February 10, 2011). Valparaiso University Law Review, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1759537

Contact Information

Timothy P. O'Neill (Contact Author)
John Marshall Law School ( email )
315 South Plymouth Court
Chicago, IL 60604
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 807
Downloads: 103
Download Rank: 158,070

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.328 seconds