Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1760053
 
 

References (21)



 


 



Truth in Law


Andrei Marmor


University of Southern California - Gould School of Law

November 3, 2011

USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 11-3

Abstract:     
In this essay I offer a speech act analysis of truth evaluable content of legal prescriptions. The argument is based on two main frameworks: one, drawn from an analogy with truth in fiction, explains the prefixed nature of legal statements, and the second explores the propositional content of legal prescriptions as a species of exhortative speech acts. Overall, the essay suggests an interpretation of legal prescriptions that allows for the validity of standard legal syllogisms.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 29

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 12, 2011 ; Last revised: November 3, 2011

Suggested Citation

Marmor, Andrei, Truth in Law (November 3, 2011). USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 11-3. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1760053 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1760053

Contact Information

Andrei Marmor (Contact Author)
University of Southern California - Gould School of Law ( email )
699 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States
213-821-5437 (Phone)
213-740-2551 (Fax)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,065
Downloads: 326
Download Rank: 51,324
References:  21

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.391 seconds