Shifting the Paradigm of the Debate: A Proposal to Eliminate At-Will Employment and Implement a 'Mandatory Arbitration Act'
Zev J. Eigen
Yale University - Law School (Visiting)
Cornell University - Law School
February 13, 2011
Indiana Law Journal, Forthcoming
Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper No. 11-04
Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 11-37
This article recasts the debate over mandatory arbitration of employment disputes as a discussion of the need to overhaul some critical elements of the way in which workplace rights disputes are adjudicated. Efforts to overhaul the system such as the Arbitration Fairness Act perpetuate the status quo of unjust cost-driven exploitation by law-breaking employers and employees alike. The authors provide an alternative two-part solution. First, we propose a "Mandatory Arbitration Act" that attempts to remedy legitimate problems like forum privacy that increase bad employers' abilities to hide from the law, while retaining significant benefits of pre-dispute arbitration like flexibility, speed, and reduced costs which augment access to justice for low wage earners. Second, we propose that employees engaged in interstate commerce can be terminated only if there is cause for the termination or severance pay given in lieu thereof. The article outlines a new employment standard that will provide employees with protection, allow employers to operate with greater certainty, and restore creditability and accountability to discrimination law.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28
Keywords: mandatory arbitration, arbitration, employment, labor, pre-dispute, resolution, ADR, mediation, negotiation, negotiations, at-will, at will, termination, just cause, Title VII
Date posted: February 14, 2011 ; Last revised: March 10, 2011
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.313 seconds